blood bank washington state

Find a Public Cord Blood Bank Near You + Seach a Directory and Puget Sound Blood Center) collects cord blood donations directly in Washington state. State law regulates blood donation. In Washington State teenagers who are 16 and 17 can donate with parental consent. Think about becoming a donor. The evidence also demonstrated that there were several groups in the United States with an increased risk for developing AIDS. The highest incidence of the. blood bank washington state

Upcoming Events

You probably think of me as Aaron Judge, Fresno State alum
and New York Yankee home run specialist. But before I was
rookie of the year and an All-Star, my parents (both teachers)
taught me the importance of being humble and giving back.

That's why I started my All Rise Foundation to inspire young
people to put service over self through community involvement.

Now we're partnering with the Central California Blood Center
to encourage everyone to make a positive local impact through
the uplifting experience of giving blood.

Because if you want to save lives, giving blood is a home run.






- Aaron Judge

My All Rise Foundation is partnering with the
Central California Blood Center to encourage
everyone to make a positive local impact through
the uplifting experience of giving blood.

Because if you want to save lives, giving blood
is a home run.


1 of 3


Buy Now

Makenzie Michael, phlebotomist, prepares to draw blood from Steve Emhoff, left, at Yakima Red Cross Blood Donation Center Wednesday, July 14, 2021 in Yakima, Wash.


Buy Now

Erica Flores, phlebotomist, prepares Kevin Frazier, right, for blood bank washington state blood donation at Yakima Red Cross Blood Donation Center Wednesday, July 14, 2021 in Yakima, Wash.


Buy Now

Erica Flores, phlebotomist, disinfects Kevin Frazier's arm before starting a blood draw at Yakima Red Cross Blood Donation Center Wednesday, July 14, 2021 in Yakima, Wash.

1 of 3


Buy Now

Makenzie Michael, phlebotomist, prepares to draw blood from Steve Emhoff, left, at Yakima Red Cross Blood Donation Center Wednesday, July 14, 2021 in Yakima, Wash.


Buy Now

Erica Flores, phlebotomist, prepares Kevin Frazier, right, for a blood donation at Yakima Red Cross Blood Donation Center Wednesday, July 14, 2021 in Yakima, Wash.


Buy Now

Erica Flores, phlebotomist, disinfects Kevin Frazier's arm before starting a blood draw at Yakima Red Cross Blood Donation Center Wednesday, July 14, 2021 in Yakima, Wash.

The American Red Cross is urging those able to donate blood this summer to help end a nationwide shortage.

While it’s not unusual for the Red Cross to have fewer donations in the summer months, the pandemic has caused an even greater need for blood, said Betsy Robertson, regional communications director for the Red Cross Northwest region.

“Every donation has the chance to help save up to three lives,” Robertson said. “I just think that’s tremendous. What a gift of yourself.”

The Red Cross needs to collect more than 1,000 additional blood donations every day to meet hospitals’ current demand.

“This year as kind of a post-pandemic experience, we’re seeing a much greater need from hospitals than what we predicted or have seen in the past this time of year,” Robertson said.

There have been fewer blood drives during the pandemic, so it has been more difficult to donate, said Doug Kikendall, blood bank supervisor at Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital.

Yakima Valley Memorial receives 100% of its blood supply from the Citibank credit card customer care number toll free pune Cross.

“I’m really aggressive about trying to get blood into our hospitals so that we’re covered in the Valley, and we have the supply that we need here, but it’s getting hard,” Kikendall said. “I’m hoping there doesn’t become a time where we don’t have what our patients need.”

The Pacific Northwest has one of the best blood donation rates in the nation, he said. While Yakima Valley Memorial has not experienced a blood shortage yet, Kikendall encourages people to consider donating to prevent any shortage from happening.

Who should donate?

Everyone is encouraged to donate blood, Robertson said. The Red Cross is especially looking for type O donors because in an emergency transfusion situation, that is the most needed type of blood.

If you don’t know which type of blood you have, the best way to find out is to give blood. Some people also find out from their doctor, she said.

“The blood shortage is not suddenly going to disappear this month,” she said. “We always need donations coming in so please continue to give when you can.”

People who are 16 and 17 need parental consent to donate blood in Washington state. There is no maximum age and “you’re never too old to give blood,” Robertson said.

People must be at least 110 pounds and have sufficient iron.

“We test everyone for their iron count before they make a bank of the west lodi ca hours and one of the more common deferrals is if your iron is low,” Robertson said. “And that can also be good to find out.”

People should hydrate before and after blood bank washington state blood.

If you’ve received a COVID-19 vaccine, the Red Cross will ask you to provide the manufacturer name when you come to donate.

For all currently approved COVID-19 vaccines, there is no deferral period for donating blood. If you have been vaccinated and you are unsure about which vaccine you received, the Red Cross asks that you wait two weeks before giving blood.

To keep a safe blood pool, those who travel out of the country might have limitations on blood donation. In Washington state, blood donors do not have to wait to give blood after getting a tattoo as long as it was done by a state-regulated entity using sterile needles, officials said.


The Red Cross has a nationwide campaign to give out $10 gift cards for everyone who donates blood through July blood bank washington state are entered for a chance to win gas for a year at a $5,000 value and a chance to win a trip for four to Cedar Point in Sandusky, Ohio, or Knott’s Berry Farm in Buena Park, Calif. The trips include two-night accommodations and two days’ worth of admission tickets.

“We regularly have incentive programs,” Robertson said. “This month it’s Amazon and the amusement park opportunity. Next month we’ll have something else.”

The Red Cross has gone a long time trying not to have incentives, Kikendall said. That way, there’s no risk of people lying about their health situation to receive money for their blood.

“It’s a real thin line because the Red Cross was always proud to be a volunteer donor and that generally makes a safer blood supply,” he said. “The incentive of you’re helping your neighbor was always good enough but right now it’s really short.”

People who wish to donate can make an appointment by using the Red Cross blood donor app, visiting, or calling 1-800-REDCROSS.

Editor's note: Information about giving blood after a tattoo has been corrected this story. The Red Cross encourages donors to make appointments, but there might be appointment spots available for walk-ins when people don't show up. Walk-ins are always welcome at Red Cross blood drives. 


Plasma Donation Centers in Seattle, WA




Tuesday:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

Wednesday:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

Thursday:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

Friday:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

Saturday:06:45 AM - 02:45 PM

Christmas Eve/Christmas Day



12/21/2021:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

12/22/2021:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

12/23/2021:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

12/24/2021:06:45 AM - 12:30 PM





12/28/2021:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

12/29/2021:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

12/30/2021:06:45 AM - 06:15 PM

12/31/2021:06:45 AM - 05:00 PM


Donor Referral Program

Help Us Fight COVID-19


You are here

Public:Be The Match Public


Bank Director:David Lin, MD, MHA

Bloodworks Northwest (formerly Puget Sound Blood Center) was the first cord blood donation program in the Pacific Northwest. Stem cells collected by the program are made available to patients worldwide. Bloodworks Northwest became the 6th public cord blood bank in the USA to receive the FDA Biologics License on 28 Jan. 2016.

Collection hospitals as of October 2021:

  1. Swedish Medical Center Hospitals - First Hill, Seattle, WA
  2. Swedish Medical Center Hospitals - Issaquah, WA
  3. EvergreenHealth Medical Center - Kirkland, WA
  4. Overlake Medical Center - Bellevue, WA
  5. Valley Medical Center - Renton, WA

Bloodworks Northwest also processes and stores cord blood collections arriving from the Hawaii Cord Blood Bank (see their donation spots on the map).  Hawaii hospitals as of October 2021:

  1. Adventist Health Castle, Kailua, Hawaii
  2. Kaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
  3. Kapi'olani Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
  4. Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
  5. Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii





5Donor Screening and Deferral

December 1983 Blood Products Advisory Committee Meeting

Interim Local Efforts to Screen Aggressively

In early to mid-1983, studies had shown that AIDS patients had a low ratio of CD4 lymphocytes to CD8 lymphocytes when compared with healthy individuals (Evatt, Engleman interviews; Goedert 1989). On July 1, 1983, Stanford University Blood Bank became the first in the United States to screen donated blood with a surrogate test, which identified reversed T-cell ratios, to reduce transmission of AIDS. Between July 1983 and June 1985 at Stanford, a total of 33,831 blood donations were screened for CD4:CD8 ratios. Of those donations, 586 had CD4:CD8 ratios less than or equal to 0.85 and were discarded. However, serum samples from these donors were retained and later tested for HIV when the test became available. Dr. Edgar Engleman found that 1.9 percent of the 586 discarded donations were later found to be HIV positive (Galel, et al. 1995). The 1.9 percent of 586 donations translates to approximately 11 infected donations that were discarded. Each donation is usually divided into three components (red cells, platelets, and plasma), each of which is typically transfused into a different patient. Therefore, the removal of 11 infected units of blood may have protected 33 patients from acquiring HIV (Engleman interview; Galel, et al. 1995).

The test was relatively easy to implement at Stanford because the Stanford University Blood Bank was conducting immunological research at the time. Others interviewed stated that the CD4:CD8 ratio test would have been difficult to implement on a nationwide scale because the equipment required was costly and the test had to be performed manually (Perkins, Sandler, Osborn, Gompert interviews). It was believed that large-scale use of the CD4:CD8 ratio test required a flow cytometer, which was available only in research laboratory settings (Gompert interview).

In July 1983, NIH's National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute released a request for application to develop tests to identify the AIDS carrier states and to measure the sensitivity of the tests. Shortly thereafter, Irwin Memorial Blood Bank in San Francisco, directed by Dr. Herbert Perkins, evaluated the anti-HBc test as a surrogate marker for HIV. The study took approximately three months, and the results were difficult to interpret, as the correlation between a positive anti-core test and selected areas of residence in San Francisco was more prominent by ethnic origin than sexual preference. Overall, 6 percent of donors tested positive for anti-HBc. The frequency of anti-HBc was higher in males than females, and the difference in frequency was larger between people of differing ethnic origins than between homosexuals and heterosexuals. The author concluded that implementing the test would not be of clear benefit and that the subsequent exclusion of 6 percent of donors could lead to blood shortages. In general, anti-core testing showed a 6 percent positive rate in blood donors, a 12 percent positive rate in blood donors who self-excluded, a 70 percent positive rate in gay men, and a 95 percent rate in AIDS patients in STD clinics (Pindyck interview). Irwin Memorial Blood Bank did implement the test blood bank washington state May 1984 to ease recipients' fears of receiving blood (Perkins interview).

Reliability of Surrogate Tests

On December 15-16, 1983, the FDA's Blood Products Advisory Committee (BPAC) held a two-day meeting to discuss the possible implementation of surrogate tests on blood donations to exclude high-risk donors. The objective of the BPAC meeting was to "review the results of research to define tests which could be applied to blood, plasma, or donors that would indicate an increased risk of the transmission of AIDS" (FDA, BPAC 1983).

Dr. Dennis Donohue, director of the FDA's Division of Blood and Blood Products, had recommended that hepatitis B anti-core testing be incorporated for routine plasma screening (in addition to current requirements) since it would identify 90 percent of all potentially infectious (or high-risk) donors (FDA, BPAC 1983c). In his opinion, the implementation of anti-core testing would add a further measure of confidence in product safety at a relatively low cost (Donohue interview; Ojala 1983). He stated, "Anti-core testing lends itself to the plasma situation," with only five to six central testing laboratories and one site responsible for product safety within each laboratory (CCBC 1983).

At the December BPAC meeting, industry representatives proposed the creation of a task force to deliberate the details of the recommendation and provide further information in three months (FDA, BPAC 1983c). According to CDC and FDA documents, industry proposed the task force in order to delay the implementation of surrogate testing (Donohue interview; Ojala 1983). An internal memorandum of one participant, Cutter Biological, stated that the proposal to convene a task force "was one that had been agreed upon by all the fractionators the previous evening" and that "the general thrust of the task force [was] to provide a delaying tactic for the implementation of further testing" (Ojala 1983). Although Blood bank washington state. Donohue was not completely satisfied with the task force approach, he agreed to it; and thus the BPAC created an industry task force to consider the logistics of anti-HBc (core antibody) as an additional screening test.

Task Force Report on Surrogate Testing

The task force created at the December 15-16, 1983, BPAC meeting reported their findings on March 6, 1984. The members were divided as to "whether routine testing of potential blood and/or plasma donors for the presence of anti-HBc was an appropriate means of identifying members of high-risk groups associated with AIDS" (Rodell 1984). The report contained a majority position paper opposing the implementation of anti-HBc and a minority report favoring its implementation.

The task force reviewed several pilot tests performed at blood banks in high-risk areas. The pilot tests comprised four studies on anti-HBc; two studies on B2-microglobulins; and one each on Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), immune complexes, Neopterin, T-cell ratio measurement, Thymosinal, and Alpha interferon. The discussion focused on the anti-HBc test.

Data showed that 5 percent to 18 percent of blood and plasma donors had a positive test for anti-core. The CDC data showed that 84 percent of homosexual males tested positive for anti-HBc and that 96 percent suntrust routing number ga IV drug users had a positive test for anti-core. The test itself was highly sensitive (98 percent) but not specific (70 percent).

The discussion blood bank washington state the December BPAC meeting had stipulated that ''cost-benefit analysis and disease prevalence must be considered in the decision regarding whether or not to use the test" (FDA, BPAC 1983c). However, the task force could not agree upon the true cost of the test, with estimates as low as $2.50 per test for plasma collectors and as high as $12.00 per donation for whole blood collections (Rodell 1984). Additional costs were the blood that would be discarded and the recruitment and replacement of donors. The task force could not agree on the costs and the benefits of using the anti-core test as a surrogate for high-risk donors.

A contemporaneous internal Cutter memorandum indicated that industry believed core testing would eventually become a requirement. At that time, Cutter executives recommended that the company implement core testing as quickly as possible to "obtain a competitive advantage in the market place" and that they "[make] hancock county savings bank weirton wv mention of [their] plans to others" (Ojala 1983).

Support for the Implementation of Anti-HBc. The minority who favored implementation of the anti-HBc test presented the following arguments: 60-80 percent of blood bank washington state tested positive for anti-HBc; the test would reduce the need for recall of blood products (i.e., AHF concentrate); the test could help reduce the incidence of non-A, non-B hepatitis in recipients of blood products; and blood and plasma collectors had an obligation to do all that was possible to increase the safety of the blood supply.

Opposition to Surrogate Testing. The majority against using the test blood bank washington state that the anti-HBc test was insufficiently specific for AIDS and would exclude excessive numbers of donors. In addition, some speculated that there would be a reduction in the availability of donations from groups such as Mexican, African, and Asian Americans, who have a higher prevalence of core antibody but whose rare blood types are needed in the blood supply to service that very population. Finally, the high proportion of positive sera from known homosexuals suggested that the test was not distinguishing homosexuals with multiple partners who may have been carriers of AIDS from homosexuals who were not at increased risk of having AIDS (FDA, BPAC 1983c; CCBC 1983). They argued that wide-scale implementation of core testing of donated blood would eliminate approximately 15 percent of plasma donors and capital source pacific western bank percent of whole blood donors (FDA, BPAC 1983c). Additional arguments were that the epidemic seemed somewhat contained within defined risk groups; the test would cause blood banks to incur high cost, and there would be a loss of the protective antibodies to hepatitis B in the blood supply.

Comment on the Blood Products Advisory Committee

The BPAC served in this instance as a forum through which the blood banks and plasma industry could, and did, influence the FDA to adopt policies that favored their interests at the expense of the public interest. The membership of BPAC included blood and plasma organization representatives, scientists, and physicians (FDA, BPAC 1983c). The group was not a monolith. Its members differed on the role of government agencies and actions to take regarding blood safety. There is also evidence can i use my hsa card at walgreens internal, nonpublic correspondence that some BPAC members deemphasized the risk to the blood supply in their public remarks but were very concerned in private. At a BPAC meeting in Washington in December 1982, Joseph Bove, M.D., committee chairman (and also chair of the American Association of Blood Bank's Committee on Transfusion Transmitted Diseases), said that there was not enough evidence that the blood supply could transmit AIDS to restrict donations from male homosexuals. However, in a contemporaneous report of the American Association of Blood Banks, Dr. Bove acknowledged the likelihood that AIDS was transmitted by blood. "I believe the most we can do is buy time," he stated, adding, "there is little doubt in my mind that additional transfusion-related cases and additional cases in patients with hemophilia will surface" (Bove 1983).

Informing the Public

The blood industry was concerned about providing information on AIDS to the public lest donors take fright and stop blood bank washington state blood (Curran interview). In January 1983, Dr. Bove reported on behalf of the AABB's Committee on Transfusion Transmitted Diseases that "we do not want anything blood bank washington state do now to be interpreted by society (or by legal authorities) as agreeing with the concept—as yet unproven—that AIDS can be spread by blood" (Bove 1983).

AIDS Politics

Although many groups within the U.S. population had a stake in blood donations and blood transfusion, male homosexuals were well represented at the table where policymaking occurred, while other affected groups had minimal representation (e.g., patients with hemophilia were represented by the National Hemophilia Foundation) or no representation (e.g., future recipients of blood or blood products). The influence of special interest groups was reflected in the inconsistent recommendations about donor screening in the early 1980s. For example, as discussed earlier, prisoners could not donate blood even though their rate of hepatitis B infection was lower than the rate reported in male homosexuals. Haitians and tourists who had visited Haiti within the past three americas best eyeglasses locations could not donate (Katz 1983). There were no restrictions first republic bank newport beach donation, however, by the group with the highest prevalence of AIDS and hepatitis (homosexuals). Representatives of the homosexual groups demanded protection of gay rights to privacy or confidentiality. Moreover, there was a concern that homosexuals might lie about their sexual orientation and donate blood if blood banks implemented direct questions about sexual orientation (Evatt, Silvergleid interviews). Given the scientific uncertainties and lack of representation by other consumer groups, the demands of the gay groups exerted considerable force in the debates regarding donor screening (Rodell interview).


5 Replies to “Blood bank washington state”

  1. Hello, currently I am pursuing PGPM from a reputed college in Kolkata, recently I got in contact with hdfc credila for edu loan. Will it be a safe option to take a loan from credila?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *